None and both

It´s a hard one:
On one hand there is no such thing as “positive” and “negative”. And on the other hand both exist.

Like Love – it is both indiscriminately all-embracing but sharply discriminative as well.

We only have our common-sense and intuition to rely on when to be one thing or “the other”…

About julienmatei
I feel an inner urge to express what I see, to communicate and share with others all these impressions. Often the things I see are there, not yet manifest, but waiting... to be observed, talked about, and embraced. These new insights need another approach, a more vivid curiosity... Due to fear and prejudice we prefer to see only "the official" truth - but THE OFFICIAL TRUTH IS DEAD - being dead, it has nothing to give... We can continue pretending Death is fascinating or... we can take the trouble to LIVE... THE NEW has no definition yet... Again, IT requires another "perception", the courage to apprehend everything differently, from a totally new angle, with new confidence and inquisitive touch. This blog is not about interesting concepts, it is about participation... finding new solutions, inspiration, togetherness.

2 Responses to None and both

  1. SprinklinThoughts says:

    positive & negative exist – so how can there be no such thing? The only way is if you move up or down through the dimensions – one of which is awareness… in this physical world positive & negative exist and are – period. I suppose in some other state/dimension (like of awareness) they do not exist…

  2. seeingwhatis says:

    There is no such things as positive and negative. We can pretend it does, but out does not exist. I know you have seen this.
    Communication is hopeless, but in the game of communication we need words like positive and negative. If only to describe illusion contra truth.
    So we use illusion in a hopeless attempt to perform a hopless act of illusion.
    I don’t think discriminating love exist, do you?
    There is this total acceptance towards everything… The rest is illusion. Or?
    Should “love” be more fantastic than all inclusive acceptance. The non-feeling of acceptance is so many times more profound than love.
    I remember, I used to feel love was a kind of pain, like a cup that could never be filled. Only short moments. Like hunger. Like fear of loss. Need of promises. One could argue that this experience of love was rare. That there is different love. But then again… Why not call it “letting things be”. When love is unconditional, is it still exclusive?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: