Your invisible nearness

The story of a lingering fragrance…

When thought ends, Love begins

Why do you need so many Whys?

If you asked Life why It exists, it will simply answer:
I EXIST BECAUSE I EXIST.

The saving of our world from pending doom will come

…not through the complacent adjustment of the conforming majority, but through the creative maladjustment of a nonconforming minority.

– Martin Luther King

 

(Through Monica Cassani)

Asking Rox – is there a free will, after all?

How much Fate is there in Life, and how much Free Will?
You must have posed yourself this question. I for one, inevitably do…

Fact is that more often than not, I feel there is no free will; not in the sense that we are deprived of freedom, but rather that Fate seems to govern our Lives.

It´s really my case: Whatever I try to make happen, fails. And when I least expect anything, something happens. Truly puzzling…

It feels as if Providence has always the last word.

To Melissa

Poetry knows without knowing…

Mirrors of Encounters

The shore is awaiting the evasive shadow…

Your eyelashes are tremblingly eager

Like your fading glance

Reaching far a purple dream

The season

The melting silk

The mute swan

They all wait

For the return

 

View original post

Can we grasp anything without any preconceived knowledge?

Swarn Gill:
Words must have meaning. I have just written a sentence, if you do not know the meaning to any of the words, there is nothing to ponder. To ponder the concept of ‘ego’ one must have their own definition of what ‘ego’ is to have an opinion of it. To have a discussion with someone else they must either share the definition or if they have different definitions they explain to each other what Ego means to them.

Me:
That´s my question:

Is Meaning something we ascribe based on a certain standpoint or argument? Do we understand anything according to an ubiquitous thesis after all?

Of course I hear what you say. Freud speaks about Ego – or, of whatever else – in a certain way, Jung, in a different manner. Philosophically speaking, we are expected to build up a suitable consensus – a system – if we are to appropriate anything.

That´s exactly what I am trying to avoid. That is:

Can we be so free and unbiased as to have a discussion without taking account of definitions and explanations?

Can we be so direct and intuitive as to take on something without any preconceived knowledge?

What happens to a poem if we try to “explain” it? Don´t we kill the very essence of music, if we are to define what music intrinsically is?

Can we thus be so free of any preconception to grasp a “truth” without “understanding” it?

 

Related articles:

https://julienmatei.com/2014/01/29/ego-this-nauseous-fraud/