To read or not to read

At times I feel such immense repugnance – I simply can no longer bring myself to read these days.

It is so time-consuming and it makes me absolutely mad: all these fucking bloggers, wannabe writers, or even renowned authors, write at length – that is, skilfully masturbate – about something which often could be said in no more than a short paragraph.

Spare my precious time!

I can´t put up with this fucking overwhelming blather.

Can you?…

Advertisements

About julienmatei
I feel an inner urge to express what I see, to communicate and share with others all these impressions. Often the things I see are there, not yet manifest, but waiting... to be observed, talked about, and embraced. These new insights need another approach, a more vivid curiosity... Due to fear and prejudice we prefer to see only "the official" truth - but THE OFFICIAL TRUTH IS DEAD - being dead, it has nothing to give... We can continue pretending Death is fascinating or... we can take the trouble to LIVE... THE NEW has no definition yet... Again, IT requires another "perception", the courage to apprehend everything differently, from a totally new angle, with new confidence and inquisitive touch. This blog is not about interesting concepts, it is about participation... finding new solutions, inspiration, togetherness.

5 Responses to To read or not to read

  1. namelessneed says:

    i do, daily/ precious time is for the burning/ who knows where & when beauty may surface

  2. Lightrays says:

    I was just thinking while in Barnes and Noble there are just to many words.

    • julienmatei says:

      Love acts, it hardly needs words…
      If It ever talks, its words are few and poignant…;)

    • julienmatei says:

      About your post “Do not dwell in the past”

      I wanted to leave a comment there but by whatever reason, the comment section couldn´t open.

      You wrote:

      “If there is pain I have brought it from the past. If there is fear I have brought it from the future.” So far , so good, I wholly agree. But further:

      “Neither place exists and yet without them I would not be held in the synchronicity of the Present” – I hear what you say, but don´t get it.

      Please elaborate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: